Harrop: GOP will logically have to pursue IVF and research
Only
eight of the Republican Party's 210 House representatives voted in favor of a
bill to protect the right to contraception, demonstrating the party's dire
situation. We're discussing contraception.
Rep.
Cathy McMorris Rodgers of the 5th Congressional District in Washington State
criticized the plan, calling it a "Trojan Horse for more abortions."
Start
by stating the obvious. The unintended pregnancies that result in abortions are
prevented with contraceptives. Additionally, during the past 40 years, the
number of abortions in this nation has significantly decreased, thanks to an increased
usage of contraceptives.
Other
Republicans grumbled that Democrats were merely acting to show support for the
birth control protection law. Since contraceptives are currently legal in every
state. One might concur, however, Justice Clarence Thomas recently argued that
the rationale for the Supreme Court's decision to reverse Roe v. Wade could
also apply to contraception.
On
the basis that Congress, and not the courts, should have codified any national
right to abortion, some people have objected to Roe. Well, the
Democrat-controlled House just adopted that strategy about
contraception. A law ensuring a right to birth control was passed.
Republicans
are moving in that direction, so the question, "What about embryos?"
must be asked. Amy Coney Barrett, a Supreme Court justice, signed a declaration
claiming that life begins at fertilization while she was a law professor. A
fertilized egg becomes an embryo.
Every
year, fertility clinics waste tens of thousands of abandoned embryos. This is
because only one or two eggs are usually placed in the woman
during a single cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment, which normally
entails collecting 10 or more eggs. In fact, several nations demand that these
extra embryos be destroyed after a set amount of time.
States
that see embryos as human beings ought to demand that clinics either freeze all
unused embryos or shut down. Frozen embryo storage might cost more than $1,000
a year.
Justice
Samuel Alito stated that abortion takes away both "potential life"
and the life of an "unborn human being" in his decision that
overturned Roe. The same justification is used by opponents of contraception:
sperm and eggs are already capable of becoming life.
A
man suffering from Type 1 diabetes, which was previously incurable, appears to
be cured thanks to a new medication produced from embryonic stem cells. Brian Shelton,
a 57-year-old patient from Ohio, cried with joy: "This is a whole new
life. It's miraculous in a way.
One
of the developers was Dr. Doug Melton. Following President George W. Bush's
decision to forbid federal financing for research involving the destruction of
embryos, Melton was forced to sever his lab's ties to Harvard University in
2001. Fortunately, Melton was able to build a separate lab with the aid of
private funding.
Then
there is research on embryonic stem cells, which has a lot of promise for
eradicating medical calamities like Alzheimer's and heart disease. Embryos must
be destroyed throughout the operations, many of which were donated by IVF
patients who didn't need them.
Voters
should consider whether they want to support a Republican Party that thinks in
this way and that couldn't get even one of its 27 members to endorse something
as basic as birth control as the midterm elections draw near.